THE NORTH: A PAST IN THE FUTURE
KEYNOTE ADDRESS DELIVERED AT THE
CONFERENCE OF LEADERS AND ELDERS OF NORTHERN NIGERIA AT KANO ON 10TH
MARCH, 2014 BY
DR HAKEEM BABA-AHMED
A little over 60 years ago, Northern
leaders were faced with a very difficult choice. They were challenged by the
need to take a decision over whether to go along with demands from compatriots
from Southern Nigeria for immediate self-government for the Nigerian colony, or
oppose it in the interests of Northerns. The stakes were very high indeed. To
oppose immediate self government in an atmosphere in which the nationalist
fervor was most intense was to risk condemnation from patriotic Nigerians, many
of them Northerners, who wanted to see an immediate end to colonial rule. On
the other hand, to submit to the demand for self government then would have
exposed the Northern Region to all the disadvantages of relative backwardness
and the possibility of being overrun by the more developed Southern Region,
economically and politically. Northern Leaders, aware of their powers to resist
being stampeded or blackmailed, chose to demand for a delayed and staggered
decolonization process, in the belief that the Northern Region needed
additional time to prepare for self government.
History has recorded how Northern
Region representatives were derided and harassed out of Lagos and all the way
to the North for the decisions they took. It has also recorded the consequence:
the first riots in the North with political undertones. The Southern Regions
got their Self-Government two years before the Northern Region, and the specter
of protectionism which informed many Northern policies right up until 1966 has
since been the subject of much debate.
Sixty years after that historic ‘No’
by the North, the region is facing a different challenge under circumstances
that are entirely different. In 1953, the North had a strong and visionary
leadership and a hefty hand of support from the colonial administration. That
leadership had the confidence to stand up to being bullied, and was comfortable
with the certainty that its decisions were consistent with the interests of the
people of the region. Today, the people of the old Northern Nigeria are without
leaders who will take a stand on the National Conference and get the nation to
respect that position. It has no leaders who will move against the crippling
assaults on lives and property of its poor and defenseless citizens because
power is in hands of people who appear too far removed from Northern interests.
In the sixty years since that historic nay by Northern leaders, the fortunes of
the North have flowed and ebbed, largely determined by the consistent decline
in the quality of its leadership. Sixty years after one North took one
position, today we witness a most undignified stampede for crumbs from leaders
and elite who should draw the line and offer leadership and guidance for
Northerners. Simple northern folk are confused and bewildered by the
conflicting signals those who should know are sending. Some say we are
drowning, so we should swim further into the ocean. Some say we should swim
towards land, but are unsure about the distance we have to cover. Some say we
have lost the battle to survive, and should submit as a conquered people do.
Not long after the 1953 dissent by
the North, all Nigerian leaders closed ranks and commenced the serious business
of planning and negotiating for an orderly disengagement. Dates were set
without apologies or recriminations until full independence was achieved in
1960. Northern leaders had respect, and in turn respected leaders from other
parts of Nigeria. It took a statesmanly posture and a five minute speech from
Sir Abubakar Tarfawa Balewa to resolve the bitter disputes over the 1956 census
figures. The 1959 elections disputes were resolved because the North realized
the need for compromise, and because the two regions in the South realized that
alienating the North entirely in a political gang-up was likely to end the
Nigerian union. A confident North was able and willing to enter into alliances
with powerful interests in the South; carve out a Region in the former Western
Region and maintain a level head in the wake of the constitutional crisis which
followed the 1964 elections.
The tragic consequences of the 1996
coup have shaped virtually all major developments in Nigeria since then. Even
in times of extreme adversity, Northern leaders were consistent in standing up
for Northern and national interests. The North sacrificed its cohesive unity
when Northern officers created states to cripple the potency of the threat of
secessation from the East. Its plural nature was given politico-legal
expression by the creation of States on the basis of some elements of northern
minority interests. Northern military officers led the war against a rebellion,
and northern limbs and lives reclaimed the territorial integrity of the
Nigerian state, while northern blood nourished its full re-integration.
The North paid its dues in terms of
the damage of prolonged military rule. Northern officers overthrew Northern
officers as well elected leaders in the scramble for power and its spoils.
Northern military officers made thousands of southern businessmen millionaires
through state patronage, while destitution and underdevelopment became more
pronounced in their region. Still operating under the illusion that they had
powers to decide who ruled Nigeria, they bungled the 1992 elections; reinstated
full military rule with Abacha, and after him, embarked on an ill-fated attempt
to re-engineer a new national leadership after their own image, under President
Obasanjo.
Northern hegemony came unstuck after
1999. Obasanjo’s eight years showed Northern politicians that they had grossly exaggerated
their capacity to control and determine the direction of political developments
in Nigeria. Within the first four years of his two terms, Obasanjo had
completely dismantled the northern political establishment that created him,
and the northern political elite has been on the defensive since then.
The hunter became the hunted, when
Obasanjo made a mockery of PDP’s zoning formula and showed up the impotence of
the northern political leadership in the manner he engineered the emergence of
the presidency of Umaru Yar’Adua and Goodluck Jonathan. The ill-fated northern
consensus enterprise against President Jonathan showed up the abject
powerlessness of the northern political elite. A northern PDP gang-up played
into the hands of Jonathan, who exploited all the faultlines of faith and fear
in the North to weaken the region. Other northern politicians joined in the
scramble for the heart and soul of the North, and thousands of people went on a
killing and burning spree in much of the North to protest the 2011 election
results.
After 2011 lines were more firmly
drawn. The North had become politically decimated. Political opposition was
weak and localized. The president took over the mantle of leadership in the
midst of ashes and rubble and widespread bitterness. His immediate supporters
saw a regional resistance and hostility against him only because of his
geo-ethnic and religious identity. He himself felt alienated from much of the
North, which is now having to contend with an intensifying threat from an
insurgency President Jonathan had inherited. Tragically, the insurgency was
wrongly labeled as a political resistance against a Jonathan presidency by
people who lost power to him.
The nation began to drift further
apart. The Southwest built up a politically-homogenous enclave and began to
live under the illusion that it was safe from the rest of Nigeria. The East
made capital out of the fortunes of the South South, and its people paid a
heavy price as victims of a religion-inspired insurgency in the North. The
South-South basked in new found affluence, and the confidence that comes from
believing that it can get away with whatever it desires. The North became
further fragmented politically, swamped by a rampaging insurgency and the
crippling decay of its economy.
This was the context in which
President Jonathan decided to convene the National Conference. Lets be clear
about this. This is the moment of the greatest weakness of northern leaders. Of
all the power blocs that could resist him, the weakest is the northern bloc. A
dangerous insurgency has developed from within it, and it has been powerless to
fight it, or to get the President to fight it with better results. Its
politicians are generally hostile to him, but their hold on their people is
very weak. The region has been badly damaged by ethno-religious divisions,
suspicions and conflicts. Its economy is crumbling by the day. Its attempt to
cobble, together with the Southwest, a broader political opposition holds some
promise, but this promise can be subverted by deepening the faultlines around
the region’s pluralism. In short, the North is powerless to resist.
In spite of major setbacks suffered
by the National Conference idea, President Jonathan had insisted it had to go
ahead. It suffered from the denunciation that it will not be a sovereign
conference. It has been condemned for not accepting to end up with a brand new
constitution. It has been condemned for having its output submitted to the
National Assembly, without a referrundum. It has been condemned over its timing
so close to an election. It has been condemned for lack of legitimacy by its
nominated delegates, for its no-go areas and for ignoring basic indices
historically used in determining participation quotas.
The release of the delegates list
has crippled this conference even more seriously. It is setting the North
against the South, which may be a good for President Jonathan if that is his
plan. It is offending Nigerian Muslims with roughly 198 delegates, while
Christians have 294. It is offending northern Christians in the North-West;
Muslims in Plateau State and the North Central zone; Christian communities in
the North East; Ijaws, Ogonis and South Western Muslims. A few weeks ago the
Nigeria Supreme Council on Islamic Affairs whose President-General is the
Sultan published a paid advert in which it raised very serious questions around
the credibility and legitimacy of the Conference. That was even before the list
was released.
All these quarrels and reservations
are unlikely to change President Jonathan’s mind over holding the Conference.
Which logically leads to the question: what could possibly be the benefit to
the President and the nation if a Conference so thoroughly condemned still goes
ahead? At this stage, it is only safe to offer some possible answers. One is
that the arguments and controversies have been deliberately designed to cause
havoc to Northern unity and deepen its problems. This will make it easier for
President Jonathan to exploit the fall out for his re-election campaigns.
Another is the possibility that these offensive and provocative imbalances are
products of poor management and scant attention to sensitivities and details.
That someone may be naive to think issues about faith and region, or even the
loaded pro-PDP participation may be managed by a good agenda that allows issues
to be discussed and decided without delegates subjecting them to parochial
sentiments beats the imagination. In today’s Nigeria this is not an assumption
that will find massive endorsement; particularly because the Conference itself
has been convened principally because it is assumed that our federal system
needs to undergo serious restructuring along ethnic lines. Whoever designs a
Conference with the prime objective of addressing perceived grievances over how
ethnic (and religious) groups relate to each other in Nigeria, and then fails
to secure the most minimal levels of inclusiveness of such groups cannot be
said to be in search of solutions.
In any case, here we are, on the eve
of a an event which can have a major impact on our future, or end up as an
almighty quarrel that will cost us billions. If it is seen as a mere talkshop,
then some of the most prominent and accomplished Nigerians who are delegates
should feel insulted that they have been reduced to participating in an
infertile junket, that will, like past events, gather dust and become another
reference point in our history of failures.
If it is planned as a serious forum
to discuss matters that could substantially alter the manner Nigerians relate
to each other, then the serious and patriotic delegates should ask whether they
are going into an arena blindfolded. How will the Conference manage damaging
quarrels that it is unrepresentative, and skewed deliberately to achieve very
narrow partisan interests? This is where the weaknesses of the North show even
more glaringly. None of the demands of its leaders on the timing, status or
composition of the Conference has been met. In fairness, it should be said that
neither have those of Ohaneze, Ndigbo and Afenifere. Yet, Northern leaders have
been nominated into a Conference at which they will be a numerical minority,
and many of them lead prominent Northern groups and have the mandates of
Governors, though not the people. If this Conference does take a life of its
own and flies off against the core interests of the North which, in any case,
will be represented by the most disunited and mutually-hostile delegation, who
will apply the brakes? In 1953 the North stood as one, sure of its position and
the nation respected and came to terms with that position. Its leader chose to
stay back in Kaduna as Premier as while Abubakar Tafawa Balewa went to Lagos as
Prime Minister. This was what they thought best suited Northern interests.
Today our cream of leaders are scrambling to attend a Conference that their
children should be attending. They have no fallback positions, no gameplan and
very little strategy, since they are unsure of the nature of the game. An
attempted walkout or withdrawal will expose the weaknesses of the region even
more severely, because no one interest or group can muster enough influence
over all Northern delegates.
This is a Conference that will have
neither the time nor the clout to take up the alarming rise of violence in the
lives of Northerners. It will not have the capacity to ask how the Nigerian
military, the same military that fought a successful civil war; the same one
that took peace to Liberia and Sierra Leone, the same one that has acquired an
international reputation as peace keeper and paid for that reputation with
blood, lives and limbs; it cannot ask how that same military cannot protect
children from being slaughtered in their schools, or protect young girls from
being abducted, or entire villages being razed to the ground routinely.
The Conference will be engaged in
quarrels over composition of Committees, rules and agenda, while Northerners
ask who exactly is killing them in towns and villages in Borno, Yobe, Adamawa,
Benue, Plateau, Nassarawa and Kaduna States. No one is sure what Boko Haram is
anymore; and questions are being asked over the claims that nomads-farmers
clashes are actually about Falani cattle rearers seeking for food for their
cattle, and villagers are only protecting their little produce and their pieces
of land. Nothing is more pressing for the North than to put an end to the
horrendous assaults on the lives of our people. We will not find answers at
this Conference. And we will not find answers to the decaying infrastructure in
the North; or solutions to millions of our young citizens who are uneducated,
unskilled and unemployed; or solutions to the dangerous trend which sheds so
much Northern blood every time elections come. We will not find answers at this
Conference to the questions over how Nigerians can ensure that the elections of
2015 do reflect the will of the people; that the North does not become another
battleground for an election that could make it an even weaker component on the
Nigerian federation.
The North will participate in this Conference
at best as a spectator, or at worst a helpless victim of a conspiracy to
exploit its weaknesses. Yet, everyone says it must attend. They say it must
attend because everyone else is attending. So the North is now reduced to
escorting others’ agenda. This is the same North that determined the fate and
destiny of this nation for many decades. This is the same North with over 70%
of the productive landmass, the region with a much larger majority of the
population; the region with potentials to develop and grow a world class
economy. This is the North that is reduced to reacting to dangerous political
stimulus, or having its young people reacting violently at the slightest
perceived provocation. This is the North that is powerless to protect Northerners
who are now routinely labeled as terrorists in many parts of the South just for
being Northerners travelling in lorries. This is the North whose leaders will
sit with delegates from other parts of the nation that are creating islands of
affluence from resources unfairly allocated to them. Leaders of the North will
parley with delegates who see the North as the only problem in Nigeria; a
problem that has to be reduced to manageable proportions. In simple terms, this
means depriving the North of its capacity to utilize its population to
re-assert itself as a key player in political competition.
When the Conference takes off,
simple folk will follow it avidly, and some will even hope that some good will
come out of it. Whatever happens, it will involve many Northerners. Many will
attend because they believe they can right all its wrongs once they are there.
They will be wrong. This Conference remains a provocative diversion. While it
goes on, the killings may continue, but they will receive less attention. Political
activities and preparations for the 2015 elections will pick up, but the
Conference will divert attention from potential breaches and manipulations
which may compromise the elections.
If the North had a strong, cohesive
and visionary leadership today, no one will dare design a Conference that so
blatantly offends all indices of justice and fairness. If they did, the North
would have had none of it. It could, in fact, organize its own Conference and
the world would have sat up and noticed. It would invite all leaders from all
groups, because the North has no quarrel with any ethnic group. But above all,
it would have ensured that there would have been no need for a Conference of
this nature.
For the Northern delegates who are
about to enter the ring with one hand tied behind your back, we can only appeal
to your conscience to do the right thing. Do not attend if all the Conference
will give you is a few millions in allowances and three months in a comfortable
hotel, away from all the problems of your people. If you have to attend, pay
close attention to how the Conference can redress its massive baggage. Insist
that the offensive imbalance between Muslims and Christians are addressed; that
Christians in some parts of North who are not represented are; Muslims who have
been ignored find a voice in the Conference; insist, before the Conference
takes off that its composition is balanced. If you cannot achieve this, work to
prevent any discussion of any substance, because this Conference is the least
qualified of all Conferences in the past, to discuss serious issues. If you
cannot do any of these, walk out. Resist the temptation to believe that the
North will be hurt more if it has no delegates at this Conference. Every
Northerner who walks out robs the Conference of more of the very little
credibility it has. The more of you that walk out, the less likely it will be
that they will claim that they held a National Conference.
So, for those who insist on
attending, here is wishing you luck. While you talk with other Nigerians,
please remind them of the abducted young girls from Borno and Yobe and Adamawa.
Remind them of the reality that even as you sleep in your air-conditioned hotels,
entire villages may be attacked for hours and young and old people killed, and
girls and women abducted. Remind them that you represent a people who are proud
to be Nigerians; who want to see a more secure, more prosperous Nigeria. Remind
them that our people are tired of fighting, and all we want to fight now is
poverty and impunity of leaders. If you have a chance to put in a word on the
Conference itself, advise that the Nation holds a more representative, more
legitimate and more popular Conference sometime after the 2015 elections.
Thank you.
Thanks for sharing this post with us. Very interested information you have - Please can you read my solicitors UK article and leave me some feedback. Thanks once again.
ReplyDelete