" If you don't know when you have been spat on, it does not matter too
much what else you think you know". Ruth Shays.
Northern Governors last
week attempted a feat the region had long jettisoned: bringing together its assets
under one roof to count its strengths and weaknesses. The Governors and senior
officials went beyond the routine and ritual of periodically assembling
for a few days in Kaduna, mostly to run away from begging and complaining
citizens. This time, they set for themselves the challenging task of putting
the region's security challenges on the table and reaching out to traditional
rulers and groups of elders to help examine just where to begin to deal with
its multiple manifestations. When you remember that a few years ago, Northern
Governors were literally forced to stop meetings in Kaduna, or attend any event
in the symbolically-important Arewa House by local youth who harassed them with
such abandon, this particular meeting which had an impressive attendance will
be recorded as an achievement for holding at all. It was even more remarkable
that Governors accepted to tap into the perspectives and experiences of
traditional rulers, that layer that hovers between uncomfortable submission to
elected politicians the age of their offspring or younger brothers, and
leveraging on the considerable opportunities that exist outside their narrow
formal environments to be heard. They even tacitly accepted that associations
of elderly Northerners who had played their parts many times over in the
affairs of the region and the nation had something of value to say in the
search for solutions.
The Governor of Borno
State who is the Chairman of the Northern Governors Forum spoke with such
passion, anger and lamentation over the state of the North, it was obvious that
the Governors had decided to do something different this time. The anger was
substantially directed at the North, the region with the size, the people and
the potential to be the richest in the nation, and to feed the entire West
Africa. It is not any such thing today. It is, instead, the wretched region, derided
and despised for begging for its existence and contributing nothing but trouble
by the rest of Nigeria. Its people are angry and terrified by its numerous
security challenges. Ten million of its young are beggars, and millions more
will not receive any type of education or skills to prepare them for productive
adult lives. Thousands of its people have died and are dying from preventable
security threats, and millions will be victims of the Boko Haram insurgency for
many years to come, or for entire lives. The North is virtually
de-industrialized, its basic infrastructure decaying beyond rehabilitation.
Desperately poor communities fight each other for every reason except those
that improve their economic well-being. The solid show of political unity
demonstrated with the election of President Buhari in 2015 is threatening to
unravel, as shadowy attackers under the generic identity of Fulani herders threaten
ethno-religious harmony in many parts of the North, providing huge
opportunities to exploit and regenerate dormant hostilities. The North that
protected its turf as one unit with such confidence and competence in the first
republic is a pathetic shadow, with nineteen governments, bureaucracies and
rulers, spending resources it does not produce on governments, not the
people.
This was the North whose
political leaders, all nineteen of them, decided to look critically at a region
that is regressing at such a rapid rate that it has become a major threat to
itself and the rest of the nation, and even Africa. Well, they got an earful
from the distinguished assemblage in turbans and robes and grey hairs on heads
in their 80s and 90s.The Sultan of Sokoto advised on the values of justice and
honesty as foundations of good governance and security. The Shehu of Borno
painted a most distressing picture of the devastation being wrecked by the
retreating Boko Haram insurgency. Emir of Kano made a strong case for far-reaching
social reforms as solutions to the deep-seated problems of the North which feed
insecurity. Other traditional rulers offered advise on dealing with cultural
pluralism, threats and strengthening governance structures. Elders took
Governors on a journey to a past which held together because leaders put
premium on justice, inclusiveness and sacrifices. They reminded Governors of
imperatives of lowering boundaries, adopting pan-Northern policies and programs
and regenerating the dilapidated assets of the North. They held Governors
responsible for exerting pressure on the Federal Government to accord priority
to adequate investments in agriculture, solid mineral development and basic
infrastructure in the North as rights and not as a favour to Northerners. They
drew attention to energetic efforts of governors from the Southwest to build
foundations for regional development and political unity. They pointed to
multiple security threats and challenges from many parts of the nation fed by
the desire to corner more resources, while the North fights itself and fritters
away its bountiful opportunities. They lamented the alarming and widening gaps
between the North and the rest of Nigeria in education, wealth creation,
security and quality of life.
Remakably, there was
also substantial yielding of grounds around boundaries and turfs. Governor
Nasir el-Rufai submitted to a meeting that had hinted that insecurity in any
part of the North is a northern problem through a detailed briefing on
challenges and responses of his government on the Shia, cattle rustling and
Southern Kaduna. Reactions to his briefing supported the view that northern
leaders recognize that developments involving the Shia (or as he insisted, the
IMN),and Southern Kaduna represented major threats to the whole North and the
nation. Not one voice failed to support the enforcement of the law against
people and groups who defy it, whatever religious garb they wear, or
their status. A few, however advised on the values of exploring additional
avenues and opportunities to manage conflicts. Dealing with overlapping
responsibilities on security, law and order between federal and state
governments is a major problem, and in both the Shia and Southern Kaduna
issues, the need for greater synergy and collaboration was identified as a
major issue that northern governors should take up with the federal government.
The outcome of the
meeting, the next day when the governors met alone, suggested that
they may have decided on a number of steps that were best left unannounced.
Some of the observations and decisions they made public must have
raised a few eyebrows, including the categorical statement that the Fulani
suspected of involvement in fights with farming communities are from other
countries in West Africa. Even making allowances for the possibility that the
governors have the evidence to support this, it is a cause of concern that the
conclusion could absolve from suspicion, the huge Fulani population which is
entirely Nigerian in fights with communities. Fulani herders, Nigerian and
foreign, will now be subjected to much closer scrutiny and potential abuse to
show evidence of nationality. The onus to secure borders and prevent illegal
entry for foreign Fulani has now been shifted to the federal government, a move
that will neither improve border security nor the security of communities in
the near future. Conflict resolution efforts and peace building will have to
meander through a position which suggests that Fulani who should be involved
are foreigners. Communities which still fear Fulani attacks will not find much
comfort in the position that their adversaries are from other countries, and
they may suspect that attempts are being made to push responsibilities further
away.
In any case, Northern
Governors have made the commendable efforts to assume primary responsibility
for the security of citizens. They have raised hopes that must be met, because
the future of the North is severely threatened by unacceptable levels of
poverty and crippling insecurity that compounds poverty. The North has never
been as politically unified in partisan terms as it is today, with only two
states in the hand of the PDP. If APC, with control of the executive and
legislature at the federal level as well as 17 of 19 northern states cannot
make a radical difference in the lives of northerners in the next one year, it
is very likely that it will find it difficult to sell itself in 2019.If
northern governors cannot find common grounds and the will to fight religious
extremism, ethno-religious conflicts, youth unemployment, banditry, kidnappings,
drugs and violence among youth, they would go down in history as the set who
lost the North irretrievably. Last week, they showed that they do not want this
place in history. They need help to restart the North.
No comments:
Post a Comment