‘Peace
is when nobody is shooting. A “just peace” is when your side gets what it
wants.’ Bill Mauldin
I
am writing this column two days before you read it. The past few days have been
full of stories, many of them contradicting each other, on developments in and
around the camps to which Fulani villagers have been relocated so that the
military can conduct operations against terrorists. Some reports say the
military authorities have allowed some of the villagers to relocate back to all
but one of the villages. There is virtually no media coverage on the fate of
Berom villagers, and the impression one gets is that only Fulani villagers have
been involved in these traumatic movements in and out of the villages they
inherited from ancestors. It is also unclear what measures are being put in
place to police the relationships between the Fulani, the Berom and the STF.
The latter has been accused by both sides on numerous occasions of aiding the
other party in killings or aiding escape. The question begging for answer is
what will happen to Fulani-Berom relations when the military withdraw after
their operations. Will attacks on Berom villages cease? Will the Berom sheath
their sword against Fulani villagers who they accuse of importing “mercenaries”
to attack them at night? Will Governor Jang tone down his own rhetoric and
posture which fuels the crisis in Plateau State?
Before
the reports that some Fulani are being allowed to return to some of their
villages started coming in, indications emerged that many of them were
insisting on abandoning the camps in which they had lived for about a week, for
their villages. They had been complaining of being virtually abandoned in camps
that lacked basic essentials such as good water, food and medical facilities.
With the commencement of the Ramadan fast, the pressure to stock-up was
mounting, and many had quietly voted with their feet and returned home. On the
whole, the life of these villagers in the past few days has been, to say the
least, unenviable. Tossed between uncertainly and insecurity, they had become a
symbol of a deep crisis over the manner the Nigerian State treats its citizens.
It is very unlikely that these Fulani villagers will find peace in the near
future, whether they are in camps or in their villages. In that respect, they
are not unlike almost every citizen in Plateau State, no thanks to a State
Government policy which has very rigid and hierarchical order of rights and
privileges of communities and citizens based on tribes and religions.
If
these Fulani villagers had abandoned the camps they only moved into reluctantly
and with profound suspicions, they would have confronted the security agencies
with difficult choices. They had been moved out ostensibly on the grounds that
the military operation planned to eliminate terrorists near or around their
villages will require about 48 hours to complete, but they may have to stay
away for at least two weeks to guarantee that they stayed completely out of
harm’s way. If the military insists that it is still involved in flushing out
terrorists in their villages, any presence will endanger the Fulani villagers.
It is very likely that the military will warn them to stay away, in camps or
anywhere else that is not their villages. Any casualties registered among the
villagers will be blamed on their stubbornness, and some people may even accuse
them of sabotaging the efforts of the military to expose the terrorists hiding in
or near the villagers. If the villagers relocate in large numbers and frustrate
operations, the military may place their villages under prolonged siege and
operations which will place them at great risk.
Although
periods have been mentioned by the military for the operation and possible
return dates, the Fulani villagers who have been relocated have no say on when
it will be concluded, or when they can return to their villages. It is now
entirely up to the military authorities to say when it is safe. So if the
villagers heed the warning of the military to stay put in their camps, they may
be in for a long haul. A long stay in squalid and unsafe environment will be
even more difficult to bear during the month of Ramadan. If any thing happens
to their villages to make it difficult for all of them to return, they will
become permanent refugees. The longer they stay away, the more difficult it
will be for them to return. Other communities on the list of “settlers” will
read their fate in the travails these villagers.
Still
it made sense to advise the Fulani from the villages of Mahanga, Kakuruk,
Kuzen, Maseh and Shong to stay in the camps while the military operation goes
on. Common sense will dictate that the seeming certainty by the military that
there is terrorist presence near their villages, and the steely determination
that they must be flushed out should be taken seriously. If indeed, non-local
terrorists exist which have been responsible for the mass murders in Berom
villages these past few weeks and months, then it is eminently in the interest
of these Fulani villagers to facilitate or cooperate in their removal. They are
in as much danger of violent criminals who attack Berom villagers as the Beroms
themselves. There is also the imperative of the Fulani showing transparent
respect of security, law and order, and complying with instructions which
enhance their security and those of their neighbours. Finally, non-resistance
may persuade the authorities to adopt a more conciliatory stance towards the
longer-term welfare of the Fulani villagers, who are, in any case, almost
entirely powerless in these circumstances.
But
those who encouraged the Fulani to accept all the conditions laid down by the
military and suffer the inconveniences will be well advised to recognize some of
their important concerns. The Fulani villagers are already substantially guilty
by association in the eyes of the security agents and Plateau State Government.
The suspected terrorists who kill Berom are related to the Fulani in official
and popular perception, because they do not kill Fulani. The heavy hand of the
state will most likely be felt by these Fulani villagers, and the slightest
expression of grievance will be interpreted as obstruction or complicity.
Second,
the Fulani villagers have no faith in the capacity of Plateau State Government
to be even-handed or compassionate where it becomes involved in their welfare
or plans over their location or relocation. They are already condemned as
settlers, even though many of the villages have had Fulani in them for over a
century. The military in the locality were reminded of the very deep distrust
of the villagers when they initially refused to accept the relief items which
got to them on the second day of their relocation. The Plateau State Government
will be entirely happier if these Fulani villagers do not relocate back to
their villages at all. The government will see this as a solution to a
seemingly endemic conflict in which villagers are shot, hacked or burnt mostly
while asleep, and their murderers melt into the night. Berom villagers do not
trust the Fulani villagers. The reverse is also the case. At least the Berom
have a Governor who is unabashedly Berom and Christian. The Fulani have only a
poor reputation as settlers who attack indigenes at will, or import
“mercenaries” to do it for them. Now they join the Hausa indigenes of the State
from Jos, many of whose fellow indigenes would also love to relocate
permanently. In Plateau State, you have no citizens, only settlers and indigenes.
The Fulani villagers who
are now caught between the hostility of the state and other communities; and
the instinct to stay put because they have no safe alternative, must be
protected by other Nigerians. They must be protected because they alone are
powerless to resist the onslaught of a Nigerian state which sees this operation
as an important exercise that will show its seriousness and capacity to tackle
terrorism. They must be protected because they represent every citizen or
community whose basic rights may be abridged by illegal and arbitrarily actions
of those in power, who think our tongue or faith can be evaluated and ranked by
them. They must be protected because they represent the tipping point in an
emerging disaster being triggered by the Plateau State Government, which will
attack the very soul of a plural nation such as ours. The Fulani villagers
should not be used to appease the incompetence and arrogance which have brought
danger to every citizen of Plateau State. Those villagers are us. They must be
protected where they are, and be allowed to relocate as early the imperatives
of national security demand.
No comments:
Post a Comment