“No leg’s too short to reach the ground.”
Lyndon Irving
In 1962, France conducted a nuclear test in the
deserts of its former colonial territory, Niger. Nigeria and a few other
nations were outraged. Nigeria took very strong steps to protest, including a
suspension of diplomatic relations with France. Niger Republic was made to feel
the anger of a very intimate neighbour, but is doubtful if it could have done
anything about it. In 1964, Israel gave a few million dollars as foreign aid to
Nigeria. Although foreign policy was in the exclusive list, the Northern
Regional government decided it was not going to accept any part of the aid for
political reasons. The rest of the country shared the aid. During the Nigeria
civil war, France worked frantically to whip up support for the rebel cause,
and having recognized Biafra itself, succeeded in getting a few African
countries to support the breakup of Nigeria. It lost its cause, and promptly found
new opportunities in the Nigerian economy and market that soon became one of
its largest in Africa.
From the early 1970s until the successful
establishment of ECOWAS as a regional economic grouping, Nigeria and Togo run
into French resistance at every turn. Nigeria in particular was seen by France
as a major potential rival in francophone Africa; and Nigeria in turn viewed
France as a major obstacle in the attempt to fully decolonize West Africa. In
1975, Nigeria took momentous decisions to challenge European support for
apartheid, and flexed its muscles in a historic series of events that dealt
fatal blows to a regime that drew its life blood from Britain, France, Holland
and a few others. Nigeria rallied Africa around a resistance against a system
that negated every element of our humanity. The system crashed a few years
later not only in Angola, Mozambique and Guinea Bissau, but in its most
fortified enclave, South Africa.
Nigeria had registered its presence and credentials as
a leader, and the world took notice, and accorded it its place. It needed no
one’s approval, resources or support to rally West African countries to contain
rebellions and civil wars in Chad, Liberia and Sierra Leone. It spent huge
amounts of its own resources, and many of its men and women made the supreme
sacrifice to secure the survival and peace of many African countries.
Then came the crash. Nigeria took its eyes off the
ball, and virtually lost all the grounds it had acquired. A series of domestic political
setbacks beginning with the early 1980s focused attention of leaders only on domestic
issues. The steady decline in our ability to manage internal political
developments reflected poorly on the international level. Nations which once
looked up to this huge country with massive resources and potentials to become
a world power walked away, or joined the queue in exploiting its collapse.
African nations lamented the decline of this once awesome African nation, and
promptly took up the space it left. The rest of the world moved in to cash in
on its corruption and serial incompetence in managing its affairs, and peddled
doomsday scenarios about its future. Far from developing into a world leader,
Nigeria declined in stature and relevance, and while its oil and gas were still
valuable, its people were kept at arms length by the rest of the world.
The nations in ECOWAS which used to look up to Nigeria
for leadership and periodic economic support began to court old friends and
masters. A number of them quickly re-wrote their history, expunging references
to the heroic exploits of Nigerians in preserving their nations, ridding them
of horrible dictators and ending civil wars.
A nation of 170million people, with resources and
potential to become a leading world economic power became content to be ignored
or pushed around by smaller nations, or others who previously trembled over its
anger on matters that affected Africa. It is now at a stage when the British
Prime Minister will announce plans to investigate how its leaders used the
trillions of dollars it earned. It is the nation which is begging, knees on the
ground, the United States, Britain and everyone else who cares to look in, for
help to deal with a home-grown insurgency, even though they all give the same
response: look inwards, the answers are there. This is the nation which a few
years ago joined the rest of Africa in resisting the creation of bases for
operations of a United States Africa High Command (AFRICOM); but is now asking
the same US for any help to deal with a domestic security threat.
This nation, without muscle, vision or respect, is now
a cheerleader for a French blitz in Mali. Its troops will sacrifice lives and
limbs, earn a few dollars, and probably be allowed a few crumbs in equipment,
but they will only legitimize French and its allies’ recolonization of Africa.
This is the nation which is now a spectator in an unfolding drama which will
expand the threats in Africa, and secure strategic, long-term interests of western
nations.
The drones which will have bases in Niger Republic
will make profound statements over the abject impotence of Nigeria in
influencing affairs around its citizens and Africans. They will tense up and
complicate an already delicate security situation. They represent intolerable
threats to the remnants of our territorial integrity and sovereignty, and they
should not be allowed to stay. The government of Niger Republic should be
prevailed upon to review its agreement to provide bases for U.S drones. If the
administration of President Jonathan is unable or unwilling to this, citizens
should raise their voice until it does. We may be sinking as a nation, but we
have not hit the bottom yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment