“An army of sheep led by a lion can
defeat an army of lions led by a sheep.” Ghanaian Proverb.
When
Governor of Niger State, Dr Muazu Babangida Aliyu said he had information that
400 Northerners have been listed for inducement to support President Jonathan's
2015 ambition, many people thought it was part of the propaganda repertoire.
After all, the same Governor had said he had documented evidence that President
Jonathan had committed himself not to run after 2011, a document Jonathan’s people
had dared him to make public. He has not. Although not inconceivable, the idea
that 400 of the most influential Northerners have been meticulously listed for
inducement (a polite term for bribery) by President Jonathan’s people was still
difficult to believe. While such a document could exist, the timing of the
release of the information made the relevation by the Governor slightly less
credible. The Governor was, after all, still engaged in his hide-and-seek with
the Bamanga’s PDP, and the propaganda war was at its fiercest.
Just when
Governor Babangida is retreating back to Jonathan’s PDP, we hear another source
say he has also seen the same list of eminent Northerners being targeted for
inducement. The chairman of Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) Alhaji Aliko
Mohammed released a statement last week, saying he had personally seen the list
containing some of the most respected people in Northern Nigeria to be induced.
The list was allegedly prepared by people working for President Goodluck’s
re-election in 2015. The ACF chairman said they have made inquiries within the
government, and have spoken with many people whose names are on the list and
they confirmed that they know nothing whatsoever about it. “No one has met
them”, he said, “nor are they interested in meeting any one on the issue.”
For a man
used to letting the ACF’s multi-talented spokesman, Mr Anthony Sani speak for
the organization, the act of signing his own statement and the language he
employed suggest that this is an issue that touches the Dan Iyan Misau in more
than one place. Note the strong language on a sensitive issue: “Those seeking
or advising the president to offer inducements in exchange for support are
clearly taking the matter of the President’s re-election away from the performance
in office to something else. If that is the case, they will be well-advised to
leave Northern leaders out of it, because the so called list which we have seen
indeed contains names of some of the most respected people in Northern
Nigeria."
So we know
one thing for certain: a list exists, allegedly drawn up by Jonathan’s
campaigners and some Northern elders. What no one can say with any certainty is
that it is indeed the product of a meticulous sifting by Jonathan’s people, of
all the influentials in the North who are primarily predisposed to being bribed
to support Jonathan become President again in 2015, presumably against another
Northen candidate. It is basic wisdom in Nigerian politics to suspect
everything, and to believe that anything is possible.
If only to
satisfy curiosity, it would be useful if someone, somewhere, could publish that
list. It is almost certainly likely to exclude General Muhammadu Buhari, Malam
Nasir El-Rufai, Malam Nuhu Ribadu, Professor Ango Abdullahi and about ten or so
sworn opponents of the presidential ambitions of Jonathan. But it will be safe
to assume that it will contain an assortment of the most senior
traditional/religious rulers, clerics with millions of followers, elders who
think they still command considerable political following, ethnic champions who
have reputations for causing havoc when they play to ethno-religious galleries;
women of substance; women without substance who can be used by men of
substance; retired, tired, expired and indigent politicians who have lost track
of political trends; influence peddlers who hobnob with politicians;
professional fixers, election riggers and crowd-renters; politicians who are in
danger of being totally marginalized;
beneficiaries
of Jonathan’s patronage who have always known that they will pay back; and an
assortment of professionals and businessmen who are still poor enough to be
induced.
On the other
hand, it may not be a good idea to publish this list, because even if it is
entirely a work of fiction, it can cause serious disaffection. First, at
individual levels, persons who think they qualify to be listed among the
400 most influential Northerners available for inducement will lose many nights
of sleep if they find their names missing. It will only mean that they are not
as important as they thought. Then you would have people who will start going
around offering to swear that it is only their worst enemies who will put their
names in that list, particularly if they prefer to think that their loyalties
are firmly registered against a Jonathan presidency in 2015. There will also be
many whose integrity or livelihood will be in serious danger merely for being
on that list. Others will have their prestige undeservedly boosted for being on
a list of 400 who are amenable to being influenced, because they are the type
who will lose elections with only their immediate families as voters. Most of
the people on that
list,
however, will lose credibility, integrity and respect (if they have any), not
because they are listed as potential campaigners for Jonathan, but because of
the suggestion that they have to be induced to play the role.
It will be
unfair to concede any credibility on a list any one could have drawn up.
Jonathan’s enemies could have drawn up the list to distance him from most
people on the list who may otherwise feel an inclination to campaign for him,
secretly or openly. To suggest that a distinguished Northerner has had to be
induced before (s)he campaigns for Jonathan will offend both the Northerner and
Jonathan’s ambition. Most people will stay away from the Jonathan train because
it has been polluted with the stench of bribery and other inducements. The list
could also be the handiwork of Jonathan’s people to portray some Northern
leaders as political prostitutes, and then leaked very carefully so that it
causes massive disaffection between those on the list and those not on it. The
uproar it will generate will conceivably polarize Northern elite along all
lines, and weaken a potential pan-Northern resistance against a Jonathan
presidency in 2015. There are also
many other
possible explanations behind the list. Jonathan’s opponents may be involved in
a pre-emptive strike to prevent collaboration by influential Northerners in a
2015 project. Some people close to the Jonathan campaign strategists may be
smiling all the way to the bank with huge amounts which they will collect in
the name of inducing the high and mighty in the North.
There is of
course a very serious issue which this enigmatic list raises. In a way it
forces the question why anyone should assume that the North is instinctively
and comprehensively against Jonathan’s 2015 ambition. If the assumption is that
Northerners are against another term for Jonathan in 2015, the question to ask
is why? The answer cannot lie in his being a non-Northerner because in spite of
the yawning gaps in the credibility of 2011 elections in many parts of the
North, many Northerners did vote for him. It cannot be that he is a Christian,
because millions of Northern Christians feel the same way as Muslim Northerners
about another four years under Jonathan.
The real
question to ask, in fact, is why is President Jonathan so spectacularly
unpopular, not just in the North, but all over the nation? Do those who manage
his campaign pause to ask how they can overcome such massive deficits in
performance from a President who fought tooth and nail to get another four
years in 2011? Tired excuses have long worn thin: Yoruba dislike him because
they have created their own ethnic party; Muslim Northerners dislike him
because he defeated Buhari; Igbos dislike him because he is Ijaw; South-South
communities envy Ijaws e.t.c. If Jonathan’s handlers think they can go to 2015
with a long list of grievances against every Nigerian community and lists of
influential people to compromise, they are in for a major surprise.
Now that the
chairman of the ACF has also seen the famous Arewa 400, we may hear of a strong
denial from the presidency that it has anything to do with it. Then people will
begin to believe that it is indeed Jonathan's people's handiwork. That will do
even more damage to his prospects for support from the North in 2015. The
defection of 4 PDP Governors from the North with their supporters as well as
the illusion that he has to buy his way using the facilitation of 400
influential Northerners will virtually seal off the North from Jonathan in
2015. The Arewa 400 could all turn out to be a gimmick in the end. But it
points to one thing: the Northern voter will substantially determine who
becomes President in 2015, and Northern elite will be watched very closely by
Northern voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment